VALLEJO SYMPHONY 2007-2008
Celebrating 25 Years with Maestro Ramadanoff

Program Notes
© 2007-08 Mary Eichbauer



October 21, 2007 - Wes Kenney, Guest Conductor
Schnittke:  Moz-Art à la Haydn: A Game with Music
Mozart:  Sinfonia Concertante
Haydn: Symphony No. 88 in G major

September 22, 2007 - From Russia with Love
Rimsky-Korsakov:  Capriccio espagnol
Rachmaninoff:  Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini
Tchaikovsky:  Symphony No. 2, "Little Russian"


October 21, 2007 - Wes Kenney, Guest Conductor

Alfred Garyevich Schnittke (1934-1998).  Moz-Art à la Haydn: A Game with Music.

Composed 1977.  Scored for two small string orchestras (each with three violins, one viola, one cello), double bass, and two solo violins.

Soviet-born composer Alfred Schnittke came of age in the postwar period when many modern composers practiced their art based on Arnold Schoenberg’s mathematical technique for use of the chromatic twelve-tone scale.  The difficulty of listening to atonal music alienated much of the public, creating the enduring myth that all modern music is incomprehensible and ugly.  After practicing atonal composition for a number of years—and enduring persecution from the Soviet authorities for doing so—Schnittke decided to explore other musical avenues.

A conservatory-educated musician, Schnittke worked as a composer for film scores.  As such, he was called upon to write fluently in many different styles, adapting himself to whatever mood the director wished him to create.  Caught between the rigor of atonal composition and his attraction towards traditional music, Schnittke eventually created a hybrid style that he called “polystylism.”  This music is still contrapuntal (i.e., the different parts, when played together, create a melodic structure), but it combines fragments of “borrowed” music with composed passages to create a new piece that comments on both styles, almost like a musical collage.

For his “Game with Music,” Schnittke borrows from two composers: from Mozart, he takes a fragment of a composition called Pantalon und Colombine, composed in 1783 by a teenaged Mozart and then abandoned.  Only the first-violin part survives.  From Haydn, Schnittke borrows an amusing idea from the “Farewell” Symphony, No. 45.  As the music winds down, the musicians do not just fall silent, they leave the stage, one by one.

What is Schnittke’s purpose in uniting these disparate styles in one piece?  “The goal of my life is to unify serious music and light music, even if I break my neck in doing so,” the composer once said.  Beneath this tongue-in-cheek comment, we find the truth that polystylism is dangerous work.  Although the composer will not literally break his neck, he might figuratively step on a banana peel.  In his witty experiment, Schnittke comments on how we listen to music, how it manipulates our feelings, and even how we approach classical performances.  Will he go too far and alienate his audience, or will he make us examine our attitudes about classical music, and come out richer for?

Out of the dark come weird harmonics.  A double bass adds a deep, growling note.  A violin practices a repetitive figure.  More instruments add their voices; we hear scratchy tremolos, played near the instrument’s bridge (sul ponticello).  Out of this chaos a Mozartian line of notes is played that ends in a dissonant chord.   More tremolos ensue.  Suddenly, as the lights come up, the whole ensemble plays a climactic tremolo, from which emerges a playful tune, sounding like a lopsided jig from Stravinsky’s Petroushka.  Again and again, melodic and dissonant passages challenge each other, trailing off into silence, harmonics, or, in one case, whistling.  A gorgeous, plaintive  harmony emerges that seems to merge the two styles, disturbed only by a dissonant dance played over it, then by dissonant harmonies played behind it.  A sudden chaos of glissandi greets the stampede of many ensemble players from the stage.  The soloists carry on cheerfully, but their energy doesn’t last.  From silence comes a fragment of Mozart’s Symphony No. 40 that dies away.  Lower strings have their own polystylistic moment to play.  The soloists play a mysterious, droning harmony that uses the steely power of the open E string against walking pizzicato that fades away as the lights go back to darkness.
 
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756-1791).  Sinfonia Concertante for Violin and Viola in E-flat major, K. 364.
Composed  1779.  Scored for two oboes, two horns, strings, solo violin, and solo viola.

M
ozart’s father Leopold, a noted violinist and violin teacher, took great pride in his son’s talent as a violinist, pianist, and composer.  Leopold became a stern stage father who pushed his son with opinionated advice on every aspect of life.  Eventually, Mozart ended up doing what he pleased—including marrying a woman his father disapproved of—but, at this time in his budding career, he was still very much under the parental thumb.

When, in 1777, Mozart was dismissed from his hated job as court violinist for the Archbishop Colloredo in Salzburg, he left his home town for a trip to Paris, with the hope of finding success in the larger world.  Accompanied by his mother, the young man traveled first to Mannheim, where he fell in love, then Paris, where his mother suddenly became sick and died. Unable to find a job in Paris that suited him, Mozart was forced to return home, hounded by his father’s admonitory letters, and take up, once again, his reinstated post at the despised Salzburg court.  On his way home, he stopped again in Mannheim, where Mozart found himself rejected by the young woman he loved (he was later to marry her sister).


These compounded disappointments in Mozart’s personal life were accompanied by increasing maturity in his creative life.  The sinfonia concertante form—a three-movement work with soloists that combines elements of the baroque concerto grosso and the symphony—was used as a showcase for two or more virtuoso performers to play against an orchestral background.  The Sinfonia Concertante was probably written during Mozart’s journey as a response to the more sophisticated musicianship he was exposed to in the French capital.  This work, with its brilliant orchestration, from which the solo parts naturally evolve, ushered in the beginning of Mozart’s maturity as a composer.  The solo parts especially appeal to musicians, as they were obviously written by someone who knew both instruments intimately.  Although difficult, they fall naturally under the hand.


In 1781, Mozart was again dismissed from the Archbishop’s service—this time with a literal kick in the pants administered by his patron’s assistant.  Mozart left Salzburg, married, and moved to Vienna.  Leopold violently opposed all these decisions, and he let his feelings be known.  Did the violin come to represent for Mozart his father’s desire to control him?  We will never know, but, after that time, Mozart never composed solo works for the violin again.

The opening movement, which lasts almost as long as both the other movements combined, begins with an orchestral passage characterized by forceful chords and descending arpeggios, creating anticipation for the soloists’ entrance with a steady beat of sixteenth notes in the lower strings.  A lyrical passage accented by lively pizzicato builds to a climax, then calms as the soloists enter, and begin a spirited dialogue with the orchestra.  The soloists state and develop their own themes, picking up ideas stated by the ensemble, while echoing and complementing each other’s passages and commenting on the orchestra’s statements as well.  The repetition of themes slightly differently in the violin’s silky voice and the viola’s darker, slightly raspier one creates the effect of a true dialogue between equals.  The orchestral textures, especially the French horn solos, add a complex canvas that enhances the soloists’ work.  Towards the end, a beautiful cadenza sets each voice’s qualities against the other’s in an unaccompanied duet, moving us as no exact repetition could.

The second movement begins with a plangent theme stated by the orchestra and repeated, with variations, by the two soloists.  As in the first movement, the soloists engage in a dialogue, adding ever more inventive and poignant ornamentation to the main melody.  Horn calls add urgency, and an affecting cadenza brings the movement to a close.

The quick, cheerful finale changes the mood completely, while maintaining the close dialogue between the two instruments.  Winds and brass repeat the theme, adding their own very different characters to those of the two soloists.  A brief minor interlude is quickly transmuted once again to joy that lasts until the movement’s end.

Franz Josef Haydn (1732-1809).  Symphony No. 88 in G major.
Composed in 1787.  Scored for flute, two oboes, two bassoons, two horns, two trumpets, timpani, harpsichord, and strings.


Franz Josef Haydn began his life as a poor apprentice and choirboy and ended it as a world-renowned composer.  He wrote the first modern symphonies, and his music was popular around the world.  Strangely, for much of his career, he lived out of the limelight, unable to visit friends or travel.  Haydn served as Kapellmeister in the Esterhazy Court, one of the most powerful families in the Austro-Hungarian Empire.  When the family moved from estate to estate, Haydn went with them.  His job included supervising the orchestra, composing music for special occasions, and producing operas for the Esterhazy entourage.  Although his responsibilities never allowed him much more freedom than correspondence and a few important commissions from outside the court (such as the Paris Symphonies), the job must have agreed with him, because he composed over a hundred symphonies, and hundreds of other works.

Late in Haydn’s life, when the newest Esterhazy prince lost interest in music and let Haydn go, he immediately traveled to London, where he made a sensation with his symphonies.  He met the young Mozart, with whom he developed a deep friendship, and, briefly, became Beethoven’s teacher.  The Symphony No. 88 dates from his Esterhazy period, and must have been premiered at the court.

In a few instances, Haydn used folk motifs in his work, but often, as in this symphony, his themes have a folk-like character.  Haydn’s first musical experiences revolved around folk music; his father, a wheelwright who could not read music, played the harp by ear and sang.  Haydn must have brought these experiences with him when he taught himself the fundamentals of composition and went out into cosmopolitan Europe.

An adagio introduction of stately, halting chords in the strings leads to a sprightly allegro dance.  The simple theme is stated by strings, and accompanied by winds.  The theme’s complex development leads to a recapitulation, or restatement of the theme, doubled by a solo flute.

The largo second movement begins with an oboe solo, accompanied by winds and brass, and continues with strings.  The winds take over again, as the strings accompany with pizzicato.  Forceful chords, timpani strikes, and tremolo in the strings contrast with the simple, reedy melody that demands a light touch, and temper the melody whenever it becomes too distressingly sad.  

 

The menuetto: allegretto movement begins as a stately dance put forward and echoed between sections of the orchestra.  The allegretto interlude is played more legato, or smoothly, than the rest of the movement, and includes a held background note, called a drone.  The drone, reminiscent of a bagpipe, and displaced accents, give the movement an almost folk-song texture and character.  The menuetto returns to end the movement,

The finale, which is played allegro con spirito, again sets out a simple theme that is inventively developed and echoed among winds, brass, and strings.  A furious passage that almost seems ready to become a fugue suddenly softens.  Mincing strings alternate soft and loud passages to introduce the exciting rondo that concludes the work. top


September 22, 2007 - From Russia with Love

Nicolai Rimsky-Korsakov (1844-1908).  Capriccio espagnol, Op. 34. 
Composed 1887; first performed 31 October 1887 in St. Petersburg, with Rimsky-Korsakov conducting.  Scored for: 2 flutes, piccolo, 2 oboes (one doubling English horn), 2 clarinets, 2 bassoons, 4 horns, 2 trumpets, 3 trombones, tuba, timpani, bass drum, cymbals, snare drum, triangle, tambourine, castanets, harp, and strings.

Born in St. Petersburg, Rimsky-Korsakov started his career in the Russian Navy, but soon joined a group of amateur composers called “The Five,” known for their opposition to the prevailing musical taste of the time, under Peter the Great.  Only Western music was considered worth listening to, and Russian folk themes were not respected as raw material for classical music.  (Ironically, at this same time, composers in Western Europe were using their own countries’ folk themes for inspiration.)  Things changed for the composer when he was appointed to teach at the St. Petersburg Conservatory, and found that he needed to learn the principles of harmony and counterpoint so that he could teach them to his students.  Today, this self-taught man is known as one of the most brilliant orchestrators of modern times.  When praised for his magnificent orchestration of Capriccio espagnol, however, Rimsky-Korsakov emphatically distinguished between orchestration as the mechanical assignment of themes and harmonies to certain instruments, and a superior talent he felt that he possessed: knowing exactly which instrument produced a timbre, or voice, suitable for each effect he was trying to produce.  Each solo instrument, each section, sings out with a unique articulation of sound, almost as if the instruments were trying to speak.  This is one of the most expressive works ever written for orchestra.

Capriccio espagnol is a joy both to hear and to play, as evidenced by the orchestra’s reaction at the work’s first rehearsals, conducted by Rimsky-Korsakov himself.  Unable to suppress their enthusiasm, the musicians continually interrupted the work to applaud its composer.  Delighted by this response, Rimsky-Korsakov decided to dedicate the work to the orchestra—not just as a group, but as individuals.  On the title page of the published work, he named every one of them.

Consisting of five short movements played without pause, Capriccio espagnol begins with a brief, happy Alborada (“Morning Dance”).  Led by the deep beat of the timpani and the festive sound of the full orchestra, the solo clarinet joins the sprightly dance.  The solo violin comes to dance in its turn.  The action slows and stops with a roll of the timpani.

The Variazioni (“Variations”) begins with a lovely, slow harmony by French horns that will be passed around through the orchestra in slightly different versions.  Strings repeat the delicate melody, imbuing it with their own distinctive character.  Tremolo in the strings underlies a sadder melody passed between the lonely voices of the English and French horns.  Strings return to repeat their earlier variation, with reminders of the lonely horn melody.  The harp accompanies the winds, which repeat the melody once again, followed by strings.  A flute plays ascending and descending scales as strings repeat a section of the haunting melody.  The movement ends with a simple plucked string.

The Alborada returns, only now the solos are displaced, with the clarinet taking over for the violin, and vice versa, as they engage in a lively dialogue.  The clarinet plays quick, flowing scales that are almost glissandi, and the brief movement ends with a fanfare.

A drumroll introduces the brass playing a majestic Spanish melody as a fanfare in Scena e canto gitano (“Scene and Gypsy Song”).  A dramatic violin cadenza repeats the theme with ringing chords and arpeggios, ending with harmonics.  Timpani, snare drum, and crisp, ricochet bowing and pizzicato in the strings form a background for the exotic melody, played by flute.  The flute plays a cadenza, then the clarinet.  The harp is heard, and the full orchestra jumps in, with the upper strings playing the theme emphatically against accompaniment by winds and percussion.  The violin and clarinet play a complex, intertwined melody.  Gradually, the full orchestra returns, as the music alternates quiet passages with stormy ones.

In a surprising move, Rimsky-Korsakov forbears to resolve his fourth movement when we expect it.  Instead, he interjects the Fandango asturiano (“Asturian fandango”), which begins without pause.  Its completely different character indicates a radical change from what went before. The violins—together, and then solo—play a rocking melody that sounds like a country dance played by a fiddler.  Solo instruments take turns playing this cheerful tune.  Excitement builds as the themes from the Alborada and the Scena return to be played against the fandango.  Galloping strings race through the past themes, rushing to a brilliant ending.

Sergei Rachmaninoff (1873-1943).  Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini, Op. 43.
Composed July-August 1934; first performed 7 November 1934 in Baltimore, Maryland, with Rachmaninoff as piano soloist.  Scored for: 2 flutes, piccolo, 2 oboes (one doubling English horn), 2 clarinets, 2 bassoons, 4 horns, 2 trumpets, 3 trombones, tuba, timpani, glockenspiel, bass drum, suspended cymbal, snare drum, cymbals, triangle, harp, strings, and solo piano.

Niccolo Paganini (1782-1840) was the greatest violinist of his time, perhaps of all time.  Many of the virtuoso techniques common among violinists today were either invented or popularized by him.  His 24 Caprices for Solo Violin, Op. 1, especially the incredibly difficult Caprice No. 24 in A minor, have influenced composers such as Liszt, Chopin, Schumann, Brahms, and many violinists, such as Fritz Kreisler, who sought to emulate his virtuosity.  These were not the only musicians who took up Paganini’s implicit challenge by writing variations of their own to match the master’s.

As a piano virtuoso well known for his thirteen-note reach, Sergei Rachmaninoff might have wanted to wrestle with Paganini’s ghost—Paganini was said to have sold his soul to the devil for his talent—by writing a work that would be as fiendishly difficult for piano as Paganini’s Caprices were for violin.  Rachmaninoff’s Rhapsody is divided into 26 sections: a brief introduction, a statement of the theme, and 24 variations, each lasting from 20 seconds to nearly three minutes.

The Rhapsody is played without pause, but it does divide up into three “movements” by tempo and mood.  Movement I surprises us by beginning with a variation before stating the theme.  The first movement lasts until section 10; the second from 11 to 18, and the finale from 19 to 24.  In the seventh variation, and several times afterwards, something strange happens: the pianist plays the theme from the Dies Irae, an apocalyptic plainchant about the Day of Judgment that was part of the Medieval Latin Mass.  By using this as a counter-theme, Rachmaninoff makes an ironic comment about the whiff of sulfur surrounding Paganini, and, by extension, himself and all virtuosi.  Music is in the moment, dying the very second it is played, no matter how talented the mortal who performs it.  This ominous theme becomes an idée fixe in Rachmaninoff’s work, a reminder of mortality in the midst of musical splendor.

Strings begin abruptly, and the piano jumps in with supporting chords.  At first, the piece feels dry, like an etude.  This is actually the first variation, played before the statement of the theme, which comes next.  Again, the piano stays in the background as the strings play Paganini’s theme.  The piano comes to the fore in Variation II and restates the theme with some embellishment.  In the third variation, the orchestra plays the embellishment just played by the piano, while the piano takes a supporting role.  In Variation IV the piano plays both parts, and excitement begins to build.  In Variation V, the first really complicated rhythm for the piano appears, but in VI, things slow down.  The piano restates the theme differently with each hand (in smooth legato and crisp staccato), while the English horn plays a plaintive version of the theme.  Variation VII places slow chords by the piano against a recurring, four-note bassoon solo, and muted, pizzicato strings.  Rachmaninoff cleverly hides this first statement of the Dies Irae theme by slowing it down so much that we have to listen for it.  Variation VIII bursts upon us with emphatic chords, while IX adds a diabolically difficult off-the-beat rhythm.  In X, the last variation of the first movement, there is no mistaking the Dies Irae theme and its sinister accompaniment that suddenly gives was to a jazz-like interlude.  Falling scales by the piano against the Dies Irae theme in the orchestra conclude the movement.

Variation XI brings us a haunting tremolo accompaniment and a series of mysterious cadenzas, while XII is an exquisite, slow minuet.  Variation XIII reminds us of other Rachmaninoff piano works; the orchestra states the theme broadly while the piano plays chords that jump over a wide span of the keyboard.  Variation XIV is similar in technique, but turns the theme around, for a noticeably different, and much more modern, sound.  In Variation XV, the orchestra remains mostly silent while the piano puts on a display of difficult pyrotechnics.  The tempo slows down again in XVI, and the mysterious character returns.  Various instruments—violin, English horn, French horn—play lovely solos.  Variation XVII continues the melancholy mood of the previous variation with its slow three-quarter-time arpeggios.  Variation XVIII is the longest variation and the melodic center of the work, an expressive melody that has found a place in many movie scores.

In Variation XIX, the soloist plays a series of fast arpeggios with both hands, while making the music sound perfectly uniform in timing and dynamics.  The strings are busy in Variation XX.  Variation XXI interjects descending chromatic scales whose diabolical sound prepares us for a restatement of the Dies Irae theme.  In the military-sounding Variation XXII, the piano and strings build a wave of sound that carries through Variation XXIII.  The final variation brings back the descending chromatic scales, as well as elements from earlier variations.  The Dies Irae theme is given one final statement before we race forward—then halt, for a restrained, ironic ending.

Peter Illyich Tchaikovsky (1840-1893).  Symphony No. 2 in C minor, “Little Russian,” Op. 17. 
Composed 1872; first performed 7 February 1873 in Moscow (revised version performed 1881 in St. Petersburg).  Scored for: 2 flutes, piccolo, 2 oboes, 2 clarinets, 2 bassoons, 4 horns, 2 trumpets, 3 trombones, tuba, timpani, bass drum, cymbals, tam-tam, and strings.

Tchaikovsky and Russian music developed side by side.  Before his time, there existed little Russian musical tradition aside from folk songs.  Western music—and art and literature—were preferred by the czar and his court, some of whom never even learned to speak Russian, but conversed politely in French, finding their native tongue crude and unsuitable for refined discussions.

With the Romantic Movement in Western Europe came an interest in all sorts of indigenous art forms, from folk tales to music.  Expression of emotion, not perfect adherence to form, became not only acceptable, but desirable.  Artists and writers began to explore their roots, searching for “authentic” stories that expressed their own idealized national character.

Tchaikovsky had his differences with the Russian Nationalist group of composers dubbed by their disparagers as “the Mighty Handful,” or “the Five,” which included Rimsky-Korsakov.  Tchaikovsky’s Second Symphony won their praises, however, and Tchaikovsky even played a piano version of the Finale at Rimsky-Korsakov’s home.  The Five’s stated goal was to found a school of music based on Russian, not traditional European, motifs.  Tchaikovsky's Second Symphony owes its nickname “Little Russian” to its inclusion of Russian, and specifically Ukrainian, folk themes.  (The Ukraine was known as “Little Russia” in Tchaikovsky’s time, but the term does not find favor there today.)  Tchaikovsky said that he owed the inspiration of the Finale to the butler at his summer home, who went about his duties singing The Crane, a Russian folk song.

Much of Tchaikovsky’s music is dark and emotionally wrenching—a fitting expression of his difficult life.  He has often been compared to his contemporary, the writer Dostoyevsky, whose overwrought prose suffers a similar catharsis.  In contrast, the Second Symphony stands out for being almost uniformly cheerful.

A forceful chord opens the long Andante sostenuto section of the first movement, followed by a plaintive song played by solo French horn.  The tune is from a traditional Ukrainian song called Down by Mother Volga.  The oboe echoes the theme, and other winds echo and extend it until a climax is reached, adding brass and strings.  The horn repeats the plaintive tune, tapering off to silence.  The oboe introduces a new theme, ushering in the Allegro vivo portion of the first movement, which is picked up by the strings.  This theme is developed extensively by the full orchestra to an emotional peak.  A sort of trio in the winds interrupts the intensity with a lyrical passage.  From this comes a dramatic moment from which strings emerge to repeat the theme.  Excitement builds as the brass joins the strings.  The winds enter to calm things down for another quiet moment, and the horn repeats the original andante theme against plucked strings, until the bassoon takes over and ends the movement.

The Andantino marziale second movement begins, as its name suggests, with a martial theme, led by the timpani at a walking pace.  Soon the military atmosphere dissolves into a sweeter, lighter mood. (Tchaikovsky salvaged much of this movement from a bridal march in Undine, an opera he composed in 1869, but whose manuscript he later destroyed.)  The movement ends calmly, fading out, as we imagine the procession growing further and further away.

The lively Scherzo: allegro vivace third movement brings back some excitement with a substantial theme that builds by steps up a scale and then descends precipitously.  The central trio, with its call-and-response structure, has a folk-song character, but is not actually derived from a folk tune.  Pizzicato strings lead to an abrupt chord that resolves this movement and leads us from the C-minor home key of the symphony to the cheerful key of C major, and the Allegro vivo finale.

Dramatic opening chords command our attention.  Combined with the following chords, they seem to recall Alexis Luvov’s God Save the Czar, later used by Tchaikovsky in his 1812 Overture.  But, after this grandiose introduction, scurrying violins, imitating plucked folk instruments like the balalaika, replay the complete theme in a way that reminds us what it is: a simple Ukrainian folk tune, The Crane.  As the basis for a multitude of variations by the full orchestra, this folk theme becomes as majestic as any “original” music.  Another, more lyrical theme, played by violins, recalls other folk motifs in the piece, and forms a contrast with the forceful “Crane” theme.  By turns, the themes work together and struggle apart through a series of variations that evoke changing moods.  Just in the middle of a passage of intense seriousness, a rollicking piccolo provides one of the lightest, most self-referential moments in all of Tchaikovsky’s oeuvre.  A dark descent in the brass leads to a pause punctuated by tam-tam, followed by a rousing conclusion. top