
VALLEJO
SYMPHONY 2007-2008
Celebrating 25 Years with Maestro
Ramadanoff
Program
Notes
©
2007-08 Mary Eichbauer
October
21, 2007 - Wes Kenney, Guest Conductor
Schnittke:
Moz-Art à la Haydn: A Game
with Music
Mozart: Sinfonia Concertante
Haydn: Symphony No. 88 in G major
September
22, 2007 -
From Russia with Love
Rimsky-Korsakov:
Capriccio espagnol
Rachmaninoff: Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini
Tchaikovsky: Symphony No. 2, "Little Russian"
October
21, 2007 - Wes Kenney, Guest Conductor
Alfred Garyevich Schnittke (1934-1998). Moz-Art
à la Haydn: A Game with Music.
Composed
1977. Scored for two small string
orchestras (each
with three violins, one viola, one cello), double bass, and two solo
violins.
Soviet-born composer
Alfred Schnittke came of age in the
postwar period when many modern composers practiced their art based on
Arnold Schoenberg’s
mathematical technique for use of the chromatic twelve-tone scale. The difficulty of listening to atonal music
alienated much of the public, creating the enduring myth that all
modern music
is incomprehensible and ugly. After
practicing atonal composition for a number of years—and enduring
persecution
from the Soviet authorities for doing so—Schnittke decided to explore
other
musical avenues.
A
conservatory-educated musician, Schnittke worked as a
composer for film scores. As such, he
was called upon to write fluently in many different styles, adapting
himself to
whatever mood the director wished him to create. Caught
between the rigor of atonal
composition and his attraction towards traditional music, Schnittke
eventually created
a hybrid style that he called “polystylism.”
This music is still contrapuntal (i.e., the different parts,
when played
together, create a melodic structure), but it combines fragments of
“borrowed”
music with composed passages to create a new piece that comments on
both styles,
almost like a musical collage.
For his “Game with Music,” Schnittke borrows from two
composers: from Mozart, he takes a fragment of a composition called Pantalon und Colombine, composed in 1783
by a teenaged Mozart and then abandoned.
Only the first-violin part survives.
From Haydn, Schnittke borrows an amusing idea from the
“Farewell”
Symphony, No. 45. As the music winds
down, the musicians do not just fall silent, they leave the stage, one
by
one.
What is
Schnittke’s purpose in uniting these disparate
styles in one piece? “The goal of my
life is to unify serious music and light music, even if I break my neck
in
doing so,” the composer once said. Beneath
this tongue-in-cheek comment, we find the truth that polystylism is
dangerous
work. Although the composer will not
literally break his neck, he might figuratively step on a banana peel. In his witty experiment, Schnittke comments
on how we listen to music, how it manipulates our feelings, and even
how we
approach classical performances. Will he
go too far and alienate his audience, or will he make us examine our
attitudes
about classical music, and come out richer for?
Out of the dark come weird harmonics. A
double bass adds a deep, growling
note. A violin practices a repetitive
figure. More instruments add their
voices; we hear scratchy tremolos, played near the instrument’s bridge (sul ponticello). Out of this
chaos a Mozartian line of notes
is played that ends in a dissonant chord.
More tremolos ensue. Suddenly,
as the lights come up, the whole ensemble plays a climactic tremolo,
from which
emerges a playful tune, sounding like a lopsided jig from Stravinsky’s Petroushka. Again and again,
melodic and dissonant
passages challenge each other, trailing off into silence, harmonics,
or, in one
case, whistling. A gorgeous, plaintive harmony emerges that seems to merge the two
styles, disturbed only by a dissonant dance played over it, then by
dissonant
harmonies played behind it. A sudden
chaos of glissandi greets the stampede of many ensemble players from
the
stage. The soloists carry on cheerfully,
but their energy doesn’t last. From
silence comes a fragment of Mozart’s Symphony No. 40 that dies away. Lower strings have their own polystylistic
moment to play. The soloists play a
mysterious, droning harmony that uses the steely power of the open E
string
against walking pizzicato that fades away as the lights go back to
darkness.
Wolfgang
Amadeus Mozart (1756-1791). Sinfonia
Concertante for Violin and Viola in
E-flat major, K. 364.
Composed
1779.
Scored for two oboes, two horns, strings, solo violin, and solo
viola.
Mozart’s father Leopold,
a noted violinist and violin
teacher, took great pride in his son’s talent as a violinist, pianist,
and
composer. Leopold became a stern stage
father who pushed his son with opinionated advice on every aspect of
life. Eventually, Mozart ended up doing
what he
pleased—including marrying a woman his father disapproved of—but, at
this time
in his budding career, he was still very much under the parental thumb.
When, in 1777, Mozart was dismissed from his hated job as
court violinist for the Archbishop Colloredo in Salzburg, he left his
home town
for a trip to Paris, with the hope of finding success in the larger
world. Accompanied by his mother, the
young man
traveled first to Mannheim, where he fell in love, then Paris, where
his mother
suddenly became sick and died. Unable to find a job in Paris that
suited him,
Mozart was forced to return home, hounded by his father’s admonitory
letters,
and take up, once again, his reinstated post at the despised Salzburg
court. On his way home, he stopped again
in Mannheim, where Mozart found himself rejected by the young woman he
loved
(he was later to marry her sister).
These compounded disappointments in Mozart’s personal life
were accompanied by increasing maturity in his creative life. The sinfonia
concertante form—a three-movement work with soloists that combines
elements
of the baroque concerto grosso and the
symphony—was used as a showcase for two or more virtuoso performers to
play
against an orchestral background. The Sinfonia Concertante was probably
written during Mozart’s journey as a response to the more sophisticated
musicianship
he was exposed to in the French capital.
This work, with its brilliant orchestration, from which the solo
parts
naturally evolve, ushered in the beginning of Mozart’s maturity as a
composer. The solo parts especially appeal
to musicians, as they were obviously written by someone who knew both
instruments intimately. Although
difficult, they fall naturally under the hand.
In 1781, Mozart was again dismissed from the Archbishop’s
service—this time with a literal kick in the pants administered by his
patron’s
assistant. Mozart left Salzburg,
married, and moved to Vienna. Leopold
violently opposed all these decisions, and he let his feelings be known. Did the violin come to represent for Mozart
his
father’s desire to control him? We will
never know, but, after that time, Mozart never composed solo works for
the
violin again.
The opening
movement, which lasts almost as long as both
the other movements combined, begins with an orchestral passage
characterized
by forceful chords and descending arpeggios, creating anticipation for
the
soloists’ entrance with a steady beat of sixteenth notes in the lower
strings. A lyrical passage accented by
lively pizzicato builds to a climax, then calms as the soloists enter,
and
begin a spirited dialogue with the orchestra.
The soloists state and develop their own themes, picking up
ideas stated
by the ensemble, while echoing and complementing each other’s passages
and commenting
on the orchestra’s statements as well. The
repetition of themes slightly differently in the violin’s silky voice
and the
viola’s darker, slightly raspier one creates the effect of a true
dialogue
between equals. The orchestral textures,
especially the French horn solos, add a complex canvas that enhances
the
soloists’ work. Towards the end, a
beautiful cadenza sets each voice’s qualities against the other’s in an
unaccompanied duet, moving us as no exact repetition could.
The second movement
begins with a plangent theme stated by
the orchestra and repeated, with variations, by the two soloists. As in the first movement, the soloists engage
in a dialogue, adding ever more inventive and poignant ornamentation to
the
main melody. Horn calls add urgency, and
an affecting cadenza brings the movement to a close.
The quick, cheerful
finale changes the mood completely,
while maintaining the close dialogue between the two instruments. Winds and brass repeat the theme, adding
their own very different characters to those of the two soloists. A brief minor interlude is quickly transmuted
once again to joy that lasts until the movement’s end.
Franz
Josef Haydn (1732-1809). Symphony No. 88
in G major.
Composed in 1787. Scored for flute, two
oboes, two bassoons,
two horns, two trumpets, timpani, harpsichord, and strings.
Franz
Josef Haydn began his life as a poor apprentice and choirboy
and ended it as a world-renowned composer.
He wrote the first modern symphonies, and his music was popular
around
the world. Strangely, for much of his
career, he lived out of the limelight, unable to visit friends or
travel. Haydn served as Kapellmeister in
the Esterhazy
Court, one of the most powerful families in the Austro-Hungarian Empire. When the family moved from estate to estate,
Haydn went with them. His job included
supervising the orchestra, composing music for special occasions, and
producing
operas for the Esterhazy entourage.
Although his responsibilities never allowed him much more
freedom than
correspondence and a few important commissions from outside the court
(such as
the Paris Symphonies), the job must have agreed with him, because he
composed
over a hundred symphonies, and hundreds of other works.
Late in
Haydn’s life, when the newest Esterhazy prince
lost interest in music and let Haydn go, he immediately traveled to
London,
where he made a sensation with his symphonies.
He met the young Mozart, with whom he developed a deep
friendship, and,
briefly, became Beethoven’s teacher. The
Symphony No. 88 dates from his Esterhazy period, and must have been
premiered
at the court.
In a few
instances, Haydn used folk motifs in his work,
but often, as in this symphony, his themes have a folk-like character. Haydn’s first musical experiences revolved
around folk music; his father, a wheelwright who could not read music,
played
the harp by ear and sang. Haydn must
have brought these experiences with him when he taught himself the
fundamentals
of composition and went out into cosmopolitan Europe.
An
adagio
introduction of stately, halting chords in the strings leads to a
sprightly allegro dance. The
simple theme is stated by strings, and accompanied
by winds. The theme’s complex
development leads to a recapitulation, or restatement of the theme,
doubled by
a solo flute.
The
largo second
movement begins with an oboe solo, accompanied by winds and brass, and
continues with strings. The winds take
over again, as the strings accompany with pizzicato.
Forceful chords, timpani strikes, and tremolo
in the strings contrast with the simple, reedy melody that demands a
light
touch, and temper the melody whenever it becomes too distressingly sad.
The menuetto:
allegretto movement begins as a stately dance put forward and
echoed
between sections of the orchestra. The allegretto interlude is played more legato,
or smoothly, than the rest of
the movement, and includes a held background note, called a drone. The drone, reminiscent of a bagpipe, and
displaced accents, give the movement an almost folk-song texture and
character. The menuetto
returns to end the movement,
The finale, which is played allegro con spirito,
again sets out a simple theme that is
inventively developed and echoed among winds, brass, and strings. A furious passage that almost seems ready to
become a fugue suddenly softens. Mincing
strings alternate soft and loud passages to introduce the exciting
rondo that
concludes the work. top
September
22, 2007 -
From Russia with Love
Nicolai Rimsky-Korsakov
(1844-1908). Capriccio
espagnol, Op. 34.
Composed
1887;
first performed 31 October 1887 in St. Petersburg, with Rimsky-Korsakov
conducting. Scored for: 2 flutes,
piccolo, 2 oboes (one doubling English horn), 2 clarinets, 2 bassoons,
4 horns,
2 trumpets, 3 trombones, tuba, timpani, bass drum, cymbals, snare drum,
triangle, tambourine, castanets, harp, and strings.
Born in
St. Petersburg, Rimsky-Korsakov started his career in the Russian Navy,
but
soon joined a group of amateur composers called “The Five,” known for
their
opposition to the prevailing musical taste of the time, under Peter the
Great. Only Western music was considered
worth
listening to, and Russian folk themes were not respected as raw
material for
classical music. (Ironically, at this
same time, composers in Western Europe were using their own countries’
folk
themes for inspiration.) Things changed
for the composer when he was appointed to teach at the St. Petersburg
Conservatory, and found that he needed to learn the principles of
harmony and
counterpoint so that he could teach them to his students.
Today, this self-taught man is known as one
of the most brilliant orchestrators of modern times.
When praised for his magnificent
orchestration of Capriccio espagnol, however,
Rimsky-Korsakov emphatically distinguished between orchestration as the
mechanical assignment of themes and harmonies to certain instruments,
and a
superior talent he felt that he possessed: knowing exactly which
instrument
produced a timbre, or voice, suitable for each effect he was trying to
produce. Each solo instrument, each
section, sings out with a unique articulation of sound, almost as if
the
instruments were trying to speak. This
is one of the most expressive works ever written for orchestra.
Capriccio
espagnol
is a joy both to hear and to
play, as evidenced by the orchestra’s reaction at the work’s first
rehearsals,
conducted by Rimsky-Korsakov himself.
Unable to suppress their enthusiasm, the musicians continually
interrupted the work to applaud its composer.
Delighted by this response, Rimsky-Korsakov decided to dedicate
the work
to the orchestra—not just as a group, but as individuals.
On the title page of the published work, he
named every one of them.
Consisting
of five short movements played without pause, Capriccio
espagnol begins with a brief, happy Alborada
(“Morning Dance”).
Led by the deep beat of the timpani and the festive sound of the
full
orchestra, the solo clarinet joins the sprightly dance.
The solo violin comes to dance in its
turn. The action slows and stops with a
roll of the timpani.
The
Variazioni
(“Variations”) begins with a
lovely, slow harmony by French horns that will be passed around through
the
orchestra in slightly different versions.
Strings repeat the delicate melody, imbuing it with their own
distinctive character. Tremolo in the
strings underlies a sadder melody passed between the lonely voices of
the English
and French horns. Strings return to
repeat their earlier variation, with reminders of the lonely horn
melody. The harp accompanies the winds,
which repeat
the melody once again, followed by strings.
A flute plays ascending and descending scales as strings repeat
a
section of the haunting melody. The
movement ends with a simple plucked string.
The
Alborada
returns, only now the solos
are displaced, with the clarinet taking over for the violin, and vice
versa, as
they engage in a lively dialogue. The
clarinet plays quick, flowing scales that are almost glissandi, and the
brief
movement ends with a fanfare.
A
drumroll introduces the brass playing a majestic Spanish melody as a
fanfare in Scena e canto gitano (“Scene
and Gypsy Song”). A dramatic violin
cadenza
repeats the theme with ringing chords and arpeggios, ending with
harmonics. Timpani, snare drum, and crisp,
ricochet
bowing and pizzicato in the strings form a background for the exotic
melody,
played by flute. The flute plays a
cadenza, then the clarinet. The harp is
heard, and the full orchestra jumps in, with the upper strings playing
the theme
emphatically against accompaniment by winds and percussion. The violin and clarinet play a complex,
intertwined melody. Gradually, the full
orchestra returns, as the music alternates quiet passages with stormy
ones.
In
a
surprising move, Rimsky-Korsakov forbears to resolve his fourth
movement when
we expect it. Instead, he interjects the Fandango asturiano (“Asturian fandango”),
which begins without pause. Its completely
different character indicates a radical change from what went before.
The
violins—together, and then solo—play a rocking melody that sounds like
a
country dance played by a fiddler. Solo
instruments take turns playing this cheerful tune.
Excitement builds as the themes from the Alborada
and the Scena return to be played against the fandango. Galloping strings race through the past
themes, rushing to a brilliant ending.
Sergei Rachmaninoff
(1873-1943). Rhapsody on a Theme of
Paganini, Op. 43.
Composed
July-August 1934; first performed
7
November 1934 in Baltimore, Maryland, with Rachmaninoff as piano
soloist. Scored for: 2 flutes, piccolo, 2
oboes (one
doubling English horn), 2 clarinets, 2 bassoons, 4 horns, 2 trumpets, 3
trombones, tuba, timpani, glockenspiel, bass drum, suspended cymbal,
snare drum,
cymbals, triangle, harp, strings, and solo piano.
Niccolo
Paganini (1782-1840) was the greatest violinist of his time, perhaps of
all
time. Many of the virtuoso techniques
common among violinists today were either invented or popularized by
him. His 24 Caprices for Solo Violin, Op.
1, especially
the incredibly difficult Caprice No. 24 in A minor, have influenced
composers
such as Liszt, Chopin, Schumann, Brahms, and many violinists, such as
Fritz
Kreisler, who sought to emulate his virtuosity.
These were not the only musicians who took up Paganini’s
implicit
challenge by writing variations of their own to match the master’s.
As
a
piano virtuoso well known for his thirteen-note reach, Sergei
Rachmaninoff might
have wanted to wrestle with Paganini’s ghost—Paganini was said to have
sold his
soul to the devil for his talent—by writing a work that would be as
fiendishly
difficult for piano as Paganini’s Caprices were for violin. Rachmaninoff’s Rhapsody is divided into 26
sections: a brief introduction, a statement of the theme, and 24
variations,
each lasting from 20 seconds to nearly three minutes.
The
Rhapsody
is played without pause, but it
does divide up into three “movements” by tempo and mood.
Movement I surprises us by beginning with a
variation before stating the theme. The
first movement lasts until section 10; the second from 11 to 18, and
the finale
from 19 to 24. In the seventh variation,
and several times afterwards, something strange happens: the pianist
plays the
theme from the Dies Irae, an
apocalyptic plainchant about the Day of Judgment
that was part of the Medieval Latin Mass.
By using this as a counter-theme, Rachmaninoff makes an ironic
comment
about the whiff of sulfur surrounding Paganini, and, by extension,
himself and
all virtuosi. Music is in the moment,
dying the very second it is played, no matter how talented the mortal
who
performs it. This ominous theme becomes an
idée fixe in Rachmaninoff’s work, a
reminder of mortality in the midst of musical splendor.
Strings
begin
abruptly, and the piano jumps in with supporting chords.
At first, the piece feels dry, like an etude.
This is actually the first variation, played
before the statement of the theme, which comes next.
Again, the piano stays in the background as
the strings play Paganini’s theme. The
piano comes to the fore in Variation II and restates the theme with
some
embellishment. In the third variation,
the orchestra plays the embellishment just played by the piano, while
the piano
takes a supporting role. In Variation IV
the piano plays both parts, and excitement begins to build. In Variation V, the first really complicated
rhythm for the piano appears, but in VI, things slow down.
The piano restates the theme differently with
each hand (in smooth legato and crisp staccato), while the English horn
plays a
plaintive version of the theme. Variation
VII places slow chords by the piano against a recurring, four-note
bassoon
solo, and muted, pizzicato strings.
Rachmaninoff cleverly hides this first statement of the Dies Irae theme by slowing it down so
much that we have to listen for it.
Variation VIII bursts upon us with emphatic chords, while IX
adds a
diabolically difficult off-the-beat rhythm.
In X, the last variation of the first movement, there is no
mistaking
the Dies Irae theme and its sinister
accompaniment that suddenly gives was to a jazz-like interlude. Falling scales by the piano against the Dies Irae theme in the orchestra
conclude the movement.
Variation
XI brings us a haunting tremolo accompaniment and a series of
mysterious cadenzas,
while XII is an exquisite, slow minuet. Variation
XIII reminds us of other Rachmaninoff piano works; the orchestra states
the
theme broadly while the piano plays chords that jump over a wide span
of the
keyboard. Variation XIV is similar in
technique, but turns the theme around, for a noticeably different, and
much
more modern, sound. In Variation XV, the
orchestra remains mostly silent while the piano puts on a display of
difficult
pyrotechnics. The tempo slows down again
in XVI, and the mysterious character returns.
Various instruments—violin, English horn, French horn—play
lovely
solos. Variation XVII continues the
melancholy mood of the previous variation with its slow
three-quarter-time
arpeggios. Variation XVIII is the
longest variation and the melodic center of the work, an expressive
melody that
has found a place in many movie scores.
In
Variation XIX, the soloist plays a series of fast arpeggios with both
hands,
while making the music sound perfectly uniform in timing and dynamics. The strings are busy in Variation XX. Variation XXI interjects descending chromatic
scales whose diabolical sound prepares us for a restatement of the Dies Irae theme. In the
military-sounding Variation XXII, the
piano and strings build a wave of sound that carries through Variation
XXIII. The final variation brings back
the descending chromatic scales, as well as elements from earlier
variations. The Dies Irae
theme is given one final statement before we race forward—then
halt, for a restrained, ironic ending.
Peter Illyich
Tchaikovsky
(1840-1893). Symphony No. 2 in C minor,
“Little Russian,” Op. 17.
Composed
1872;
first performed 7 February 1873 in Moscow (revised version performed
1881 in
St. Petersburg). Scored for: 2 flutes,
piccolo, 2 oboes, 2 clarinets, 2 bassoons, 4 horns, 2 trumpets, 3
trombones,
tuba, timpani, bass drum, cymbals, tam-tam, and strings.
Tchaikovsky
and Russian
music developed side by side.
Before his time, there existed little Russian musical tradition
aside
from folk songs. Western music—and art
and literature—were preferred by the czar and his court, some of whom
never
even learned to speak Russian, but conversed politely in French,
finding their
native tongue crude and unsuitable for refined discussions.
With
the
Romantic Movement in Western Europe came an interest in all sorts of
indigenous
art forms, from folk tales to music.
Expression of emotion, not perfect adherence to form, became not
only
acceptable, but desirable. Artists and
writers began to explore their roots, searching for “authentic” stories
that
expressed their own idealized national character.
Tchaikovsky
had his
differences with the Russian Nationalist group of composers dubbed by
their disparagers as “the Mighty Handful,” or “the Five,” which
included
Rimsky-Korsakov. Tchaikovsky’s Second
Symphony
won their praises, however, and Tchaikovsky even played a piano version
of the Finale
at Rimsky-Korsakov’s home. The Five’s
stated goal was to found a school of music based on Russian, not
traditional
European, motifs. Tchaikovsky's Second
Symphony owes its nickname “Little Russian” to its inclusion of
Russian, and
specifically Ukrainian, folk themes.
(The Ukraine was known as “Little Russia” in Tchaikovsky’s time,
but the
term does not find favor there today.) Tchaikovsky
said that he owed the inspiration of the Finale to the butler at his
summer
home, who went about his duties singing The Crane, a Russian folk song.
Much
of
Tchaikovsky’s music is dark and emotionally wrenching—a fitting
expression of
his difficult life. He has often been
compared to his contemporary, the writer Dostoyevsky, whose overwrought
prose suffers
a similar catharsis. In contrast, the
Second Symphony stands out for being almost uniformly cheerful.
A
forceful chord opens the long Andante
sostenuto section of the first movement, followed by a plaintive
song
played by solo French horn. The tune is
from a traditional Ukrainian song called Down by Mother Volga.
The oboe echoes the theme, and other winds
echo and extend it until a climax is reached, adding brass and strings. The horn repeats the plaintive tune, tapering
off to silence. The oboe introduces a
new theme, ushering in the Allegro vivo
portion of the first movement, which is picked up by the strings. This theme is developed extensively by the
full orchestra to an emotional peak. A
sort of trio in the winds interrupts the intensity with a lyrical
passage. From this comes a dramatic moment
from which
strings emerge to repeat the theme.
Excitement builds as the brass joins the strings.
The winds enter to calm things down for another
quiet moment, and the horn repeats the original andante
theme against plucked strings, until the bassoon takes over
and ends the movement.
The
Andantino
marziale second movement
begins, as its name suggests, with a martial theme, led by the timpani
at a
walking pace. Soon the military
atmosphere dissolves into a sweeter, lighter mood. (Tchaikovsky
salvaged much
of this movement from a bridal march in Undine,
an opera he composed in 1869, but whose manuscript he later destroyed.) The movement ends calmly, fading out, as we
imagine the procession growing further and further away.
The
lively
Scherzo: allegro vivace third movement
brings back some excitement with a substantial theme that builds by
steps up a
scale and then descends precipitously. The
central trio, with its call-and-response structure, has a folk-song
character,
but is not actually derived from a folk tune.
Pizzicato strings lead to an abrupt chord that resolves this
movement
and leads us from the C-minor home key of the symphony to the cheerful
key of C
major, and the Allegro vivo finale.
Dramatic
opening chords command our attention. Combined
with the following chords, they seem to recall Alexis Luvov’s God Save the Czar,
later used by Tchaikovsky in his 1812
Overture. But, after this grandiose
introduction, scurrying violins, imitating plucked folk instruments
like the
balalaika, replay the complete theme in a way that reminds us what it
is: a
simple Ukrainian folk tune, The Crane.
As the basis for a multitude of variations by the full
orchestra, this folk
theme becomes as majestic as any “original” music.
Another, more lyrical theme, played by
violins, recalls other folk motifs in the piece, and forms a contrast
with the
forceful “Crane” theme. By turns, the
themes work together and struggle apart through a series of variations
that
evoke changing moods. Just in the middle
of a passage of intense seriousness, a rollicking piccolo provides one
of the
lightest, most self-referential moments in all of Tchaikovsky’s oeuvre. A dark descent in the brass leads to a pause
punctuated by tam-tam, followed by a rousing conclusion. top